Harrison v. Hart Ginning Co.

April 30, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Appellant's argument thus states its case:

"Appellant is a corporation, operating a cotton gin in Spartanburg. It is managed by Mr. Hart, as secretary and treasurer of the company, who made contracts and paid bills for the company and visited the gin occasionally. Mr. Goodwin was superintendent in December, 1920, in active charge of the operation of the gin. He had three laborers under him, one of whom was Roy Finch, a young man about 17 years of age, who had recently married and was occupying some rooms in one end of the long building,…