United States v. Ronald Douglas Patillo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:
This is a reconsideration en bane of a panel decision reported under the same name, 431 F.2d 293. We granted the government’s petition for rehearing and adopted its suggestion for reconsideration en banc because of our concern for the safety of the President and for his protection from disruptive threats of violence to his person. We considered further oral argument unnecessary, but granted permission to the parties to file supplemental briefs. Neither Patillo nor the United States has elected to supplement the excellent briefs furnished originally to the panel, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Albert Richard Roy, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Ronald Douglas PatilloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Ragansky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- United States v. Joseph Michael ComptonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Russell KelnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- State v. KilburnWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Josiah L. Merrill, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. James Peter DarbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BagdasarianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.