Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 2008Published

1Dissent

Justices LONG and ALBIN,

dissenting.

We would reverse defendant’s conviction and sentence, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Fuentes, reported at 398 N.J.Super. 142, 940 A.2d 299, 2006 WL 2690000 (2006).

*228For affirmance — Chief Justice RABNER, Justices LaVECCHIA, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS — 5. For reversal — Justices LONG and ALBIN- — 2.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ScottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006