Legal Opinion
United States v. Fred Richman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 3, 1991No. 90-1395PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Fred Richman appeals his convictions of two counts of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 1 and eight counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. 2 We affirm.
I. FACTS
Fred Richman, an attorney practicing in Chicago, Illinois, was charged with mail fraud and wire fraud as a result of his involvement in two separate schemes to defraud Wausau Insurance Company.
The first of Richman’s schemes to defraud the insurance company arose from Richman’s legal representation of Herbert Bluhm in an accident claim against the owner of Tinley Park Plaza, a shopping mall in Tinley Park,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. James "Jamie" Douglas, Martin L. "Marty" Pruitt, Leon Mason, and James AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Barry Richards, Karen Richards, Roland Pepin v. Combined Insurance Company of America and Credit Life Insurance Company of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert Coffman, Jerry Beller, and Thresher T. RippeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Patrick J. Doherty, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Jenner v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Norby WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.