Legal Opinion
Schare v. State University of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1977No. 75 C 649PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. PLATT, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendants have cross-moved for summary judgment.
*970FACTS
The named plaintiffs are students at the State University of New York at Stony Brook (“SUNY”). They have brought this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated for violation of their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 In particular, the plaintiffs challenged three regulations of SUNY which required mandatory dormitory residence for freshmen, mandatory meal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Epperson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re TrwCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Schare v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY AT STONY BROOKDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- United States v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980