Legal Opinion

Vick v. Moe

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1951No. File No. 9229PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P. J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained due to being struck by a truck operated by defendant, as defendant was backing the truck in plaintiff’s farmyard. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

Three principal questions are presented. First, should a new trial be granted because counsel for defendant asked defendant concerning liability insurance? Second, does the evidence establish that defendant was negligent as a matter of law? Third, was it error to submit to the jury the question of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff?

*146There are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barger v. ChelponSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Stehouwer v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lunden v. Brookings & Sioux Falls Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weidmeier v. EdelmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API