Legal Opinion
In Re Richardson
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 4, 2009No. 1-18-12609PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL J. KAPLAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is another “pay advice” case arising under 11 U.S.C. § 521(i). 1
The “donut cases,” which is to say cases in which the debtor timely filed pay advices for the beginning and the end of the applicable 60-day period, but omitted one or more pay advices in the middle, are well and thoroughly discussed in such decisions as In re Miller, 383 B.R. 767 (10th Cir. BAP 2008), In re Tay-Kwamya, 367 B.R. 422 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2007), and In re Wojda, 371 B.R. 656 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.2007). This writer fully agrees with those decisions.
This, however, is a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera (In Re Acosta-Rivera)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- In Re SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- In Re Tay-KwamyaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re WojdaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Miller v. Cameron (In Re Miller)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ditech Holding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- In Re: Francis v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021