State v. Ham
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Charles Mix County.. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. John Ham was convicted of grand larceny, and, from the judgment of conviction and an order denying a new trial, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.
Information was filed charging defendant with having committed the crime of grand larceny in having stolen a number of cattle belonging to Coppersmith, Reid & Comer, in Charles Mix county. Trial was had and verdict rendered finding defendant guilty. ’ Motion for new trial was overruled, and defendant appeals, assigning various errors. ■
It appears from the record that before the trial was begun, on June 12, 1908, defendant made and filed affidavit that he believed he could not have a fair and impartial .trial before the presiding judge, Hon. E. G. Smith, before whom said trial was about to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Kilpatrick v. SisnerosTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- First National Bank of Waterloo v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- First National Bank v. McGuireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Lebeck v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- State v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.