Legal Opinion
Falkowski v. 81 & 3 of Watertown, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of the motion of third-party defendant Kulback’s & Associates, Inc. (Kulback’s) seeking summary judgment dismissing the cause of action in the amended third-party complaint for contractual indemnification from Kulback’s and properly granted that part of the- cross mo*891tion of defendant-third-party plaintiff, 81 and 3 of Watertown, Inc. (81 and 3), seeking summary judgment on that cause of action. Kulback’s contends that 81 and 3 is not entitled to contractual indemnification from Kulback’s because the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Clute v. Ellis HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Resseguie v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Urraro v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Evans v. Ithaca Urban Renewal AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zegarowicz v. RipattiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Figueiredo v. New Palace Painters Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Sergeant v. Murphy Family TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Zegarowicz v. RipattiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- GMS Batching, Inc. v. TADCO Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.