People v. Perruquet
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvo
A jury found defendants James Perruquet and Mark Vreland guilty of burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary. Defendants on appeal argue that their burglary convictions must be reversed because the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they had the requisite intent to commit burglary. Defendants also argue that their conspiracy convictions must be reversed because the State failed to show an agreement between the two defendants to commit burglary. Finally, defendants argue that if their convictions for burglary are affirmed, their convictions for conspiracy must be reversed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- The PEOPLE v. WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. PersingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. HopkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- People v. RuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- People v. YbarraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- People v. DurhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- People v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.