Mullins v. Tompkins
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBenton, J.
Nan H. Mullins, the defendant in a dental malpractice action filed by Alice Tompkins, petitions for a writ of certiorari. Dr. Mullins asks us to quash the trial court’s order which denied her motion for protective order, and required instead that the materials in controversy be unsealed and provided to Ms. Tompkins, a former patient: The trial court ruled that Dr. Mullins had waived any attorney-client privilege or work product protection merely by sending the documents to her own expert. Persuaded that the trial court’s ruling departs from the essential requirements of law and that its order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Board of Regents of State v. SnyderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Lovette v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zarzaur v. ZarzaurDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Scully v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- BUCKEYE PLUMBING, INC. and ADOLPHUS A. HAYLES v. JEFFREY TODDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022