Legal Opinion

National Pigments & Chemical Co. v. Mid-Continent Mud Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 6, 1934No. 530PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

Complainant is the owner of a patent secured by Stroud for the controlling of troublesome gas which frequently appears in the drilling of oil and gas wells. The fluid not only controls and subjugates the gas, but acts as a lubricant and a strengthener of the walls of the well.

The court always approaches the solution of a controversy of this sort with tender care, since in one ease he denies to the public the use of a certain article, or in the other ease he denies to an alleged inventor the legitimate fruit of his thought and experience. In view of the decision of Judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. National Pigments & Chemical Co. v. Shreveport Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manchester Mfg. Acquisitions v. SearsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API