Legal Opinion

Rothenberg v. Wolfman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenby Clay Greenberg, J.

In an action brought by the children of Jacob Rothenberg to enforce a trust on certain assets given by him to their stepmother, now deceased, under an agreement allegedly made at the time of such gifts, defendants move to require his joinder as an additional party plaintiff on the ground that he is an indispensable or conditionally necessary party.

Such an agreement, it is clear, is enforcible either by the donee beneficiaries or, in an action for specific performance, by the promisee himself (Croker v. New York Trust Co., 245 N. Y. 17; Restatement, Contracts, § 138), In Croker the promisee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haverhill v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Croker v. New York Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Haverhill v. International Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of EmmonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  2. City of New York v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API