Legal Opinion

Swift River & Black Brook Improvement Co. v. Brown

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 8, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On report. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaskell, J.

Assumpsit, to recover on account annexed, "toll on 316,000 feet of logs, $79.00.” The plea of "never promised” was interposed with a brief statement of special matter of defense. This plea admitted the capacity of the plaintiff corporation to sue, Penobscot R. R. Co. v. Mayo, 60 Maine, 306, but, put in issue all other facts necessary to sustain the action. Nye et als. v. Spencer, 41 Maine, 272; Moore v. Knowles et als. 65 Maine, 493 ; Endicott v. Morgan, 66 Maine, 456. To recover, the plaintiff must prove, either an express promise, or facts from which the law will imply a promise from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kellogg v. Union Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1837

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Louis River Dalles Improvement Co. v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API