Legal Opinion
Department of Revenue v. James B. Beam Distilling Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 1, 1964No. 389Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
377 U.S. 341 (1964)
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
v.
JAMES B. BEAM DISTILLING CO.
No. 389.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 23, 1964.
Decided June 1, 1964.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
William S. Riley, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were John B. Breckinridge, Attorney General of Kentucky, Francis D. Burke and Hal O. Williams.
Millard Cox argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · StewartJustice Stewart
This case requires consideration of the relationship between the Export-Import Clause[1] and the Twenty-first Amendment[2] of the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Low v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.