Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Hammond

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1984No. 68703PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Dee Slocum filed a five-count petition against defendant Tom Otis Hammond, seeking under various theories to obtain one-half the value of property allegedly acquired during the period these parties cohabited. Trial court, expressing misgivings, submitted two law counts to a jury, which returned a verdict awarding plaintiff $65,500. The court then granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, on the same evidence, held for defendant on the three equity counts. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm and remand.

The evidence disclosed that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Hewitt v. HewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Iconco, a Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Jensen Construction Company, a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Smith v. Smithway Motor Xpress, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. Wilson v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Karen Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Willey v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Guzman v. Des Moines Hotel PartnersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API