Legal Opinion

Buck v. Buck

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 24, 1943No. 4-7080PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

August 21, 1912, appellee sued appellant for divorce. He alleged in his complaint the statutory ground of cruel treatment and indignities. Subdivision 5, § 4381, Pope’s Digest. Appellant answered with a general denial. From a decree in favor of appellee comes this appeal.

For reversal appellant says: (1) That appellee was not a resident of this state as contemplated by the statute, and (2) that “the appellee has condoned all the acts of cruelty and indignities of appellant.”

After a careful review of the record, we think it practically undisputed that appellee was a bona fide resident of this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Womack v. WomackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Squire v. SquireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Carlson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tarr v. TarrSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  2. Buck v. BuckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. McDougal v. McDougalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Huffine v. HuffineVan Wert County Court of Common Pleas · 1947
  5. Weber v. WeberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API