Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, C.J.:
The sole issue in this case is whether the grant of authority to prosecuting attorneys conducting inquisitions under K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 22-3101(2) to issue “subpoenas” includes the authority to issue subpoenas duces tecum. We hold that it does.
The action was precipitated by a subpoena issued by the district attorney of the eighteenth judicial district (Sedgwick county) in connection with an investigation of alleged violations of the narcotics laws. The subpoena commanded the security manager of the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company to appear before the district attorney and bring…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.Indiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. OrsiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. HobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Alpha Medical Clinic v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Cranford v. BishopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.