Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Dadlani
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2016No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-02052 (RBW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
On January 29, 2016, the plaintiff, Brig-gitta Hardin, received a favorable jury verdict against the defendants, Mick Dadlani (“Dadlani”) and Redime DC, LLC (“Red-line”), including damages totaling $687,000.00. Judgment in a Civil Action (“Judgment”), EOF No. 176. Before the Court are the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Rule 50(b) (“Defs.’ Judgment Mot.”),1 the defendants’ Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Rule 59(a) (“Defs.’ New Trial Mot.”),2 and the defendants’ Motion, in the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Democracy Partners, LLC v. Project Veritas Action FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Morsell v. Symantec CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023