Legal Opinion

Neinast v. State of Texas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2000No. 99-50811PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM,

Circuit Judge:

Today we review a challenge under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) to Texas’s fee for handicapped parking placards in light of jurisdictional and immunity defenses by the State. Texas asserts that Nell Neinast cannot bring this suit in federal court because the placard charge is a tax, barring our review under the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341, and because the ADA regulation at issue does not validly abrogate Texas’s immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. We hold that the charge is a fee unaffected by the Tax Injunction Act. We…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meyers ex rel. Benzing v. TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Shaboon v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Lipscomb v. Columbus Municipal Separate School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Henderson v. StalderDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2003
  5. McLeod v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, GADistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API