Stull v. Allen

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

Appellants, principal and surety on a supersedeas bond, challenge the validity of a judgment entered against them upon plaintiff’s motion for judgment against the surety.

It may be noted at the outset that we have only an abstract and brief by appellants, no counter abstract or brief having been filed by the appellee.

Some time in 1944, Stull, the appellee here, brought action in the city court of Wichita to recover possession of premises occupied as a shoe shop by Allen, one of the appellants here, and for $162 for rent then in arrears. Appeal…