Legal Opinion

In re Wilken

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

■ Appeal from Circuit Court, Turner County. ■ Hon. E. G. SMITH, Judge. Habeas corpus by Gustave Wiilken. From an order remanding the prisoner to custody, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFugeer, J.

On the 19th day of January, 1907, appellant was charged before a justice of the peace with the violation of a statutory provision making it a misdemeanor to sell diseased swine, and upon a verdict of guilty returned at the trial he was adjudged to pay a fine of $50 or undergo a penalty of 25 days’ imprisonment in the county jail in the event that such fine was not paid. In default of payment and pursuant to the judgment he was. imprisoned, as directed by the commitment, until discharged on the 12th day of February, 1907, by due course of law and at the expiration of his sentence. While so…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Díaz Díaz v. Cándida Campos de CórdovaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  3. Bostick v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hansen v. Gregory CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bostick v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API