Legal Opinion

Abates v. Timbes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1926No. 1 Div. 397PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The complaint in statutory ejectment need not aver that defendant “unlawfully entered.” Sufficient to aver that he “entered and unlawfully withholds.” Code, p. 510, form No. 32.

The description of a lot, as located in the city of Mobile, and otherwise sufficient, is not defective for failure to name the state and county. Courts take judicial notice that the city of Mobile is located in Mobile county, Ala. In ejectment, the only appropriate plea in bar is the general issue “not guilty.” It-puts in issue the plaintiff’s rig-ht of possession, and invites any evidence to defeat his title and right…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bynum v. GoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Etowah Mining Co. v. Doe ex dem. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Costley v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allison v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Wilcox v. WesterheideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Messer v. Dupuy-Burke Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Gunther & Shirley Co. v. Presbytery of Los AngelesArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Payton v. MadisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API