Legal Opinion

Haase v. Del Vecchio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The allegations in the petition do not rise to the level of misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance, or malversation necessary to justify the extreme remedy of removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 (see Matter of Futia v *757Weaver, 85 AD3d 1165 [2011]; Matter of Montanino v Rowley, 39 AD3d 653 [2007]; Matter of Deats v Carpenter, 61 AD2d 320, 322 [1978]).

We decline the respondent’s request for the imposition of sanctions against the petitioners in connection with this proceeding (see Rules of Chief Administrator of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 130-1.1).

In light of our determination,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deats v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Montanino v. RowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Futia v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neal v. LoncarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Neal v. PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API