Legal Opinion

Kauder v. Lautman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 16, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is against an attorney by a former client, to enforce a trust. The testimony produced at the final hearing developed the following facts: In the latter part of August, 1931, Lautman, on instructions received from Kauder and one Kirsch, a real estate agent, prepared a contract for the sale of certain premises in Deal, which Kauder intended to buy. Lautman advised Kauder that because of the pendency of divorce proceedings, between Appleby, the reputed owner of the property, and his wife, it would be advisable to have a title search made for the purpose of ascertaining the exact…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Planing-Machine Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Galbraith v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  3. Eoff v. IrvineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Henry v. RaimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  5. Crocheron v. SavageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuab Mineral Corporation v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Waters v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Schenck v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  4. Kauder v. LautmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API