Legal Opinion

Hersh v. Diekmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), entered January 15, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict finding the plaintiff Burt Hersh 60% at fault in the happening of the accident and the defendant Patricia Diekmann 40% at fault, granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the notice of appeal from the order entered January 15, 1999, is deemed an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Gomez v. Park Donuts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Pedone v. B & B Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Staples, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. McIntosh v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Kallon v. LamauteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Ramunni v. AnastasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API