Legal Opinion

Arthur v. . Griswold

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The order of the General Term, reversing the order of the Special Term which vacated the order reviving this action against the representatives of John A. Griswold, deceased, did not, in our judgment, affect any substantial right of the appellants. If the cause of action did not survive against them, that objection will still be available on the trial. If the cause of action did survive, but a joint judgment cannot be rendered against the appellants and the surviving defendants, a separate judgment may be rendered against either, or the court may direct that the plaintiff proceed separately…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Bank v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Braithwaite v. AikinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. PLATTE VALLEY NAT. BANK & TRUST v. LasenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919
  4. Mundt v. GloknerNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Henry v. HenryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API