Legal Opinion

State v. Iverson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

The State of Oregon appeals from a judgment of acquittal entered after the State declined to resubmit its indictment to the grand jury for revision following an order which sustained the defendant’s demurrer thereto.

The charging part of the indictment reads as follows :

“The said Roger Iverson on the 19th day of March, A.D. 1961, in the said County of Douglas and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously do an act which manifestly tended to cause * * * an unmarried female child under the age of 18 years, to-wit: of the age of sixteen (16)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. HarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. CassonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State of Oregon v. PEEBLEROregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. NesmithOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bonnie v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API