Legal Opinion

SAIF v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 2020No. A171025PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

337 Argued and submitted February 25, affirmed October 21, 2020, petition for review allowed March 4, 2021 ( 367 Or 668) See later issue Oregon Reports In the Matter of the Compensation of Carl S. Ward, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Robert S. Murray, Petitioners, v. Carl S. WARD, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board 1703591; A171025

477 P3d 429

Petitioners seek judicial review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board in which the board concluded that claimant, a driver for a for-hire carrier, was a subject worker of that carrier under the Workers’ Compensation Act, ORS chapter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Blanchana, LLC v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API