Hastings v. Montana Union Railway Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from Second Judicial District, Silver Bow Cownty. Action for damages for personal injuries. The cause was tried before McHatton, J. Plaintiff had judgment below.
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
Tim Hastings, the plaintiff’s intestate, was a day-laborer employed under a section foreman to keep portions of tbe roadbed of the defendant company in repair. The foreman had power to employ and discharge the men and superintend their work, and himself worked with the men. The-foreman employed the deceased, who, with a- gang of five others, was working upon defendant’s road upon the day he was killed. On November 23, 1893, at dusk about twenty-five minutes past five o’clock in the evening, the deceased and five others were repairing a track near the Parrot smelter at Butte. They had with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wastl v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
- Thurman v. Pittsburg & Montana Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
- Gregory v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
- Mulligan v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1897
- Allen v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.