Legal Opinion

Traitel Marble Co. v. Manhattan Terrazzo Brass Strip Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 5, 1932No. 451PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This suit is for infringement of claims 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the Calkins patent, No. 1,451,-491, granted April 10,1923, for a pattern and guide strip used for terrazzo flooring. We considered the patent and held it valid and infringed in Traitel Marble Co. v. Hungerford, 22 F.(2d) 259. See, also, Traitel Marble Co. v. Hungerford (C. C. A.) 18 F.(2d) 66. We may now consider only the claim of noninfrihgement.

Because of the limitations which must be placed on the claims in suit, in view of the prior art, we must hold that the appellant does not infringe.

The Mainzer British…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hunger-Ford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. Fulton Co. v. Powers Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Independent Moving Pictures Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  5. Geoghegan v. ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kennedy v. Trimble Nursery-Land Furniture, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API