Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McEnroe

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUKOWSKY, Justice.

The dispositive issue in these cases is whether the administrator of an estate is the real party in interest to seek survivor's benefits under the Motor Vehicles Reparations Act, KRS 304.39-010-340. Because we answer this question in the negative, it is unnecessary to address the limitations question presented by the parties.

The Lincoln Circuit Court concluded that the administrator of Leetta Rainwater’s estate was the proper party to bring an action for survivor’s benefits, but dismissed the action as barred by the statute of limitations. The Court of Appeals affirmed the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gregory v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  2. Howard v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  3. Shepherd v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API