Bloomingdale v. Steubing
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Lyman G-. Bloomingdale and others against Henry Steubing for trespass to real property. From an order of the city court reversing the clerk’s taxation of costs, defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
The order affects a substantial right, and is, therefore, appealable to this court. McNamara v. Nolan (Com. Pl.) 34 N. Y. Supp. 178.
The action was for “forcibly and wrongfully entering and taking possession on February 1, 1892, of certain premises, 160, 162, East Fifty-Ninth street, in the city of New York, of which plaintiffs were the lessees, under a lease from the defendant, expiring May 1, 1892,” and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for six cents damages. It was conceded by the pleadings that, “by agreement between the parties, the defendant was allowed to enter and take…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scofield v. . WhiteleggeNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- People Ex Rel. Purdy v. Commissioners of Highways of the Town of MarlboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- McNamara v. NolanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Bloomingdale v. SteubingNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Utter v. GiffordNew York Supreme Court · 1862