Maryland Casualty Co. v. Messina
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
In this declaratory judgment action to determine whether personal injury protection (PIP) benefits were payable under an automobile insurance policy, defendant, Rose Wood Messina, appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Maryland Casualty Company (insurer). Because the issues determined adversely to Messina in an earlier workers’ compensation proceeding were not identical to the issues presented in this action, we hold that the doctrine of collateral estoppel does not preclude the trial court’s consideration of Messina’s claims. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salida School District R-32-J v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Bennett College v. United Bank of Denver, National Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Governor's Ranch Professional Center, Ltd. v. Mercy of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Silver Engineering Works, Inc. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Pat's Power Tongs, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MessinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994