Legal Opinion

Hicks v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1975No. 16434PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is an action in trespass to try title, the purpose of which is to establish that the plaintiff’s title is free of an easement for street purposes. The plaintiff’s petition also contained a count seeking to recover certain funds deposited with the City of Houston. After a trial to a jury the trial court entered a take nothing judgment on the action in trespass to try title, but ordered that the plaintiff recover the money at issue. The appeal is restricted to the trespass to try title action.

In 1906 a plat of the E. C. Crawford Addition was filed in the Map Records…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. City of Mission v. PopplewellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Dykes v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Dallas Cotton Mills v. Industrial Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Reiter v. Coastal States Gas Producing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Port Isabel v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  2. Roberts v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  3. Tweedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Hicks v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. City of Dallas v. Dallas IRS Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API