Commonwealth v. Poundstone
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
The Commonwealth has appealed from the orders sustaining the demurrers made by the defendants who were tried on the charges of bribery and conspiracy.
In the course of the trial, the Commonwealth offered certain evidence which the court refused to admit. At the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s evidence, a demurrer was interposed in each case. The court sustained the demurrers, and subsequently refused to remove them.1
Without the evidence which the Commonwealth offered and which the court refused to admit, there is insufficient evidence to support a conviction of any of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. ErnestoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. KolskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Monongahela Street Railway Co. v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garcia v. Wall & Ochs, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. PoundstoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.