Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Simmons
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 27, 1923No. 13880PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The judgment overruling the plaintiff's general demurrer, being unexcepted to, stands as a solemn adjudication that the plea was good. Hollis v. Nelms, 115 Ga. 5 (4) (41 S. E. 263); Sims v. Georgia Ry. &c. Co., 123 Ga. 643 (51 S. E. 573); Dolvin v. American Harrow Co., 125 Ga. 699, 702 (54 S. E. 706, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 785); Pierpont Mfg. Co. v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 153 Ga. 455 (1) (112 S. E. 462). If the plea was not good already, it must be treated as sufficient in the present consideration. Was it sustained by the proof ?
Section 3545 of the Civil Code…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dolvin v. American Harrow Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Sims v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Pierpont Mfg. Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Hollis v. NelmsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Staten v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Chapman v. Lamar-Rankin Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Cone v. Sing Motor Implement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Harris v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Simmons v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929