Legal Opinion

Mimms v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 20, 2016No. 15-2454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Jeffrey and Gloria Mimms defaulted on their home mortgage, and in May 2014 an Illinois court entered a judgment of foreclosure. A judicial sale was conducted in March 2015, but the following month, before the state court had approved that sale, the Mimmses brought this action in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They essentially claim that the defendants, all private financial institutions, violated the Constitution of the United States by filing the foreclosure action. The district court dismissed the suit.

The plaintiffs’ complaint and their appellate briefs are familiar. Twice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. Homeward Residential, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Sturdivant v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cobige v. PHH Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Hayes v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Sturdivant v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API