Legal Opinion

Couch Construction Co. ex rel. Kimmins Corp. v. Florida Department of Transportation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1988No. 88-329PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Couch Construction Company (Couch), appeals the summary judgment finding no issues of fact and that as a matter of law, the cause was barred by res judicata. We reverse.

Couch contracted with the appellee, Department of Transportation (DOT), to widen Dale Mabry Highway in Tampa, Florida. Among other things, the contract provided that DOT was to relocate water and sewer utilities at the project site. Couch subcontracted with Kimmins to lay a drainage system in the improved area. This contract also provided that Couch would present on Kimmins’ behalf any claims it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Bondu v. GurvichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Youngblood v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Hialeah Race Course, Inc. v. Gulfstream Park Racing AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Daniel Laurent, Inc. v. Coral Television Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ntch-Wa, Inc. v. Zte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Floyd v. Homes Beautiful Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. O'Brien v. McMahon ex rel. ToddDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Wilmo on the Bluffs, Inc. v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Apstein v. Tower Investments of Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API