Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 17, 1962No. [No. 126, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybbrt, J.

This appeal questions whether the Chancellor was erroneous in determining the amount of alimony to be paid by appellant, Hiram E. Smith (defendant below), to appellee, Lula E. Smith (plaintiff below), his wife, and it also questions the validity of certain other portions of the decree.

The appellant, a clergyman, has been for many years the pastor of a Baltimore church. He also has carried on a real estate business and acquired extensive properties, generally held as tenants by the entireties with his wife, who assisted him in all of these endeavors. Since their marriage in 1931 they have had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lopez v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Borchert v. BorchertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Hull v. HullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Gunter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wooddy v. WooddyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Nelson v. NelsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. SeboldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. Kramer v. KramerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Elizabeth B. Argent v. Samuel E. ArgentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API