Legal Opinion

Harvey v. . N.Y. Cent. Hudson R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a plain case. It is evident that the primary cause of the injury was the neglect of the switchman, Baldwin, to properly adjust the switch after using it to pass the local freight back upon track number three. As Baldwin must be deemed to have been the co-servant of the plaintiff's intestate, the plaintiff cannot recover unless some neglect of the defendant, as principal, also contributed to produce the injury.

The plaintiff alleged, and sought to prove upon the trial, that the defendant had wrongfully and negligently intrusted the duty of switchman at that station to an incompetent and…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  2. Brown v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SipesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Berrigan v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Cote v. Jay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API