Legal Opinion

Rupert v. Berghuis

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 14, 2008No. Case 1:08-cv-924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Promptly after the filing of a petition for habeas corpus, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the petition to determine whether “it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see 28 U.S.C. § 2243. If so, the petition must be summarily dismissed. Rule 4; see Allen v. Perini, 26 Ohio Misc. 149, 424 F.2d 134, 141…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dexter Carl Jones v. Adam DouglasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  2. Donahoo v. CorriganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  3. Draughn v. FloydDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  4. Durden v. MacauleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Echols v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API