Rupert v. Berghuis
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Promptly after the filing of a petition for habeas corpus, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the petition to determine whether “it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see 28 U.S.C. § 2243. If so, the petition must be summarily dismissed. Rule 4; see Allen v. Perini, 26 Ohio Misc. 149, 424 F.2d 134, 141…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dexter Carl Jones v. Adam DouglasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Donahoo v. CorriganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Draughn v. FloydDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Durden v. MacauleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Echols v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.