Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1893No. 249Published

Ebbob from Llano. Tried below before Hon. A. W. Motjesund.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

The brief of plaintiff in error contains no assignment of error, nor are any propositions therein stated that call our attention to any question that plaintiff in error desires considered by this court. The entire brief consists only of a statement of the case and the xesult of the trial.

The transcript of the record contains no assignment of errors, but we And a detached paper filed with the papers in this cause which purports to ¡be a copy of the assignment of errors filed in the court below.

If this paper can be regarded as an assignment of error, it is not copied or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chappell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API