Legal Opinion

Hartrich v. Hawes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 11, 1902Published

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jasper County; the Hon. William M. Farmer, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington

The judgment in this case might be affirmed for the failure of appellant to comply with rule 23, which requires that “a party bringing a cause into this court shall furnish a complete abstract or abridgment of the record thereof.”

The pleadings are not abstracted at all, nor are the special findings asked by defendants presented in the abstract; nor the reasons filed for a new trial; nor the errors assigned on the record.

Appellants operated a large sawmill, employing fifteen to twenty hands. Appellee had been in their employ for two or three years as a common laborer or “ roustabout,” as he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huhn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. William Graver Tank Works v. O'DonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wierzbicky v. Illinois Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API