Legal Opinion

Rounds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 8, 1980No. 79-1026PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed upon a holding that (a) the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the admissibility of the defendant’s statements to the police as he did not object at trial to the admission of such statements subsequent to the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress. Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Tennant v. State, 205 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); see Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978); and (b) the trial court did not commit error in denying the defend*776ants motion for judgment of acquittal and motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Tennant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Popps v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lusk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Schwarck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Boulerice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API