Legal Opinion

Landry Mfg. Co. v. C. P. Rockwell, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 26, 1930No. 2460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Careful consideration of the evidence and arguments in this patent infringement ease brings us to the conclusion that the court below was rig’ht in finding no infringement. Tho suit is for infringement of Landry patent, No. 1,227,805, granted May 29, 1917, for a four-wheel brake device on automobiles. It was brought in June, 1927, and tried in late 192-9. In over twelve years, with practically an unlimited market for four-wheel brakes on automobiles, tho Landry device had been used on only fifty-one. This lack of commercial success goes far to discredit tho value of the invention, if not the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Buxton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. National Brass Co. v. Michigan Hardware Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1947
  3. Aeolian-Skinner Organ Co. v. Shepard Broadcasting Service, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API