Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 10, 1926No. 12063Published

1Dissent

I think that the petition for a rehearing in this case should be granted, for the reasons stated in the petition, and for the reasons which I shall herein submit, supplementary to the dissenting opinion which has been filed by me.

In the opinion of Mr. Justice Watts I do not think that he has at all answered the principal objections urged against the validity of the judgment in this case, and this I say with the greatest respect for his discriminating sense of justice. The opinion, as I see the law, does not correctly state the rights and duties of a railroad company in respect to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  5. Steenbock v. Omaha Country ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API