Post v. American Central Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 37, March T., 1912, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 51, on. verdict for plaintiff in case of George S. Post v. American Central Insurance Company. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 37, March T., 1912, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 51, on. verdict for plaintiff in case of George S. Post v. American Central Insurance Company. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for 714. On a motion for judgment for defendant n. o. v. Jones, J., filed the following opinion: Suit in assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance, which contains the following stipulations and conditions, bearing on the present case: The loss or damage shall be ascertained or estimated by the insured and…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Head, J.,
In refusing the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and directing judgment to be entered on the verdict, the learned judge of the common pleas filed an elaborate and convincing opinion. In it he reviews separately and fully each one of the legal points *364advanced by the appellant as ground for a reversal of the judgment.
After an examination of the entire record and due consideration of the arguments of counsel, we are all of opinion the case was properly tried and the judgment should not be disturbed. To undertake to here set forth the reasons that lead us…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Allegro v. Rural Valley Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Clingerman v. Everett Cash Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Robson v. Pennsylvania Mutual Live Stock InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Kearney v. Security Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Krogulski v. Northwestern National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917