Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. McKinney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1964No. 37840PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

The principal question presented in this case, wherein we have consolidated appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying post-conviction relief, is whether the prosecution knowingly permitted the use of perjured testimony to secure the conviction of defendant, Elviston McKinney, for the crime of armed robbery. If the charge be true, it is incontrovertible that defendant’s trial lacked the fundamental fairness implicit in constitutional guarantees of due process of law, thus entitling him to a new trial. Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 3 L. ed. 2d 1217; People v. Lueck, 24…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. The PEOPLE v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. The People v. LueckIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. The PEOPLE v. HoskinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. OlingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. McNealIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. ColumboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API