The PEOPLE v. McKinney
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily
The principal question presented in this case, wherein we have consolidated appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying post-conviction relief, is whether the prosecution knowingly permitted the use of perjured testimony to secure the conviction of defendant, Elviston McKinney, for the crime of armed robbery. If the charge be true, it is incontrovertible that defendant’s trial lacked the fundamental fairness implicit in constitutional guarantees of due process of law, thus entitling him to a new trial. Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 3 L. ed. 2d 1217; People v. Lueck, 24…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- The PEOPLE v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- The People v. LueckIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- The PEOPLE v. HoskinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. OlingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. McNealIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. ColumboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.