Legal Opinion

Haskel Shelton McNair and Mattie Erlene McNair v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, the Celotex Corporation, and Raymark Industries

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1989No. 89-1295PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

The Celotex Corporation (“Celotex”) suffered an adverse jury verdict and judgment in this products liability action decided under Texas law. On this appeal, Celotex challenges the district court’s interpretation of the Texas comparative responsibility statute. We affirm.

I

Haskel and Mattie McNair brought suit against Celotex and twelve other defendants asserting a right to recover under negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability theories. The McNairs alleged that each defendant was a manufacturer and/or distributor or a successor to a manufacturer and/or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re BROOKLYN NAVY YARD ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. In Re Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. Hardy v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1990
  5. Brewer v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API